Challenges


Today we started to put together our Babington burner. This burner is important because it is a versatile source of heat for: space heating, metal melting, glassworks, pottery, steam engines for remote power, heat engines for mobile power in cars and tractors, and many others. We can use it with any waste oil – crankcase, vegetable, etc. – plus pyrolysis oil from biomass once we develop it. It is not a far stretch to produce pyrolysis oil- see this simple experimental proposition. Do you think this would yield useful amounts of liquid fuel?

For the Babington burner, we drilled a 0.0135 inch hole in the face of a hollow, brass doorknob – and brazed on a fitting that supplied compressed air at a constant pressure between 20-35 psi. We were able to atomize water but when we tried motor oil we had problems. We were able to produce a bit of a flame but never sustained burning. Two possibilities: 1) the hole became clogged from debris inside the burner ball, 2) the oil was not heated sufficiently. Has anyone had success in sustaining a flame over a long period? What is a good method for automatic ignition? Best way to regulate the flow over the ball? Any feedback is welcome from experienced Babsmen.

Babs Day One

Categories: Babington Burner, Challenges, Open Engineering

[10] Comments

Stuart, Elliot, and I are here on the Solar Turbine:

For the next two weeks we will iron out the details – right now it looks like a set of 40 foot long, 2-foot wide slats – 4 of these in total – with 48x solar concentration. Cost is about $750 for this phase, including collector.

Regarding the CEB press, you’ve seen the open source tractor. That is on hold until September 3, when the Solar Turbine project Phase 1 Prototype ends. We’re way behind schedule on CEB. We need help. Unless there are others who can help, by physically coming here, camping out, and turning wrenches – it is slow progress.

This calls for a direct invitation in the true nature of open source collaboration – so if you know of anyone who can help, let us know. Requirements of candidates are:

  • Strong vision for a better world
  • Can turn a wrench
  • Have spare time to commit
  • Be able to cooperate

Come and visit, be part of nothing short of creating history. The CEB, tractor, and solar turbine are all serious products – in my opinion the 3 most important products in the Global Village Construction Set. We will take these proven concepts to full practical viability and production – as they have transformative potential.

Categories: Challenges, Collaborators, Industrial Swadeshi

No Comments

It has taken me a while to allow my experiences and inspirations from this weekend at Factor E to gestate, to ferment into tangible thoughts that I can easily disseminate to readers. Being lucky enough to sit down with Brittany and Marcin and talk face to face about what people are dealing with in this world, what we can do, and putting plans into action that can move to empower us all to have more control over our lives, has been a remarkably rewarding experience. We jokingly talked about the concept of “sitting-on-ass” (a reference to the movie Idiocracy), and how helpless many of us tend to feel, sitting around on our computers using grid power, posting blogs about how we can change the world as we often actively and knowingly perpetuate the status quo to our own guilt and disdain. My fellow sustainability junkies and myself know this feeling all too well, yet getting off the grid, if only for days at a time, and more importantly living among those who live for Global Swadeshi is more than enough to convince me that what you and I work for is possible and that we really can do something about it.

So, before I get so much into what we talked about over the weekend, I’ll fill everyone in on what it was like to experience daily life on Factor E. I got in late at night, and thanks to the generosity of Mrs. Crowther was able to be guided to the farm (it’s a bit off the map, get directions when you go!). And just in the first night I was overwhelmed by what a different world I had been catapulted into: reading Ishmael (Daniel Quinn) by a compact flourescent bulb run on off-grid power, in a cordwood house, replenishing my thirst with barrel collected rainwater (the well is nearly done for the wary), and immediately I was engulfed with an abundance of generosity and hospitality by the folks there. Outside I smelled the fresh, cool night air, free of the stench of exhaust fumes and the noise of the city.


The next morning I awoke to the sound of roosters crowing and chicks tittering and goats braying (is that what its called?) and Brittany letting the ducks out of their nest. I enthusiastically took to the garden with her, pulling unwanted plants (notice how I didn’t call them “weeds”, more about wild plants later), and feeling much better than when I do the same at my landscaping job, where I work in sterile, chemicalized, “aesthetic” beds. From the garden, while I was there, we ate broccoli, green onions and perennial onions, garlic, and various other foods.

Brittany and I, the next day, would find ourselves going out to the reservoir (in biking distance!) and encountering an abundance of wild fruit… among the wild grape vines and flowering blackberry brambles, the wild strawberries were delicious and ripe for the picking (we would eventually make some yummy jam thats been a hit back here in Columbia).

While out there we discussed the concept (and reality) of wild food forests, and how many wild plants on the Panamerican continent there are that have been selected for over thousands and thousands of years by indigenous peoples, carefully and with a profound knowledge of the ecosystems and bioregion so nuanced that it would probably escape some plant biologists. This knowledge of wild plant propagation and food forest management had been passed down through multitudes of generations through folklore and through experience in the field. They had encouraged these plants to be self managed, adaptive, resilient and fruitful, and in such a manner as to prevent invasiveness. And, as she pointed out, on a higher level, these humans were entrenched in the environment, such that even the animals around them were selecting for these plants as well, and these plants evolved to spread their seeds through multitudinous means. The implications of this kind of resource management are huge and point to some of the fundamental underlying principles of permaculture. The potential for ecological sensibility, sustainability, and abundance is obvious. Not to dis more euro-traditional sustainable agriculturalists who use less biomimicry, and more row cropping techniques (though i suggest intercropping, agroforestry and wise encouragement of wild influence), as these techniques seem to work well enough. However, time will tell which techniques work better in different situations and for different uses, though I’ve got my wild berries bet on permaculture. The experience of wild food, for someone who was raised in a suburb in the ‘rustbelt’, is transcendental to say the least.

It is impressive what insight Brittany has been developing with her approach to flora and fauna, how she is learning by written knowledge and field experience how to break down many of the preconceptions western society has about food and medicine and the properties of life in this world. Oftentimes her perspective is similar to that of those we learned about in my Anthropology of Food class at the University of Akron, wherein the life that makes up the environment we live in becomes not something to exploit or harvest so much as something to be a part of, enmeshed in. Where we are to interact with it on a moment by moment basis, and what we put into our bodies transcends mere applications of nutrition and science but nourishes the mind, the body, the soul and becomes something to bring people together and connect us on the most nuanced levels to the world we are unavoidably a part of. Folk knowledge about wild food, wild medicinal plants and how to positively and sensibly interact with our environments is becoming resuscitated and reinvigorated, as food and other ecological crises mountingly face us in our day to day lives.

So, after pulling weeds in the garden and mulching some cabbage, we took to the well pipe. On the spot we made a robust, collaborative decision as far as the best engineering practice to encourage a well pipe with a lifetime design, based on immediately available materials. We used plastic pieces cut from a filter they had built before and that had not tested well to fix screens along four 10 foot sections of PVC pipe.

Though I had done similar kind of work before, doing it off the grid was a unique learning experience, and in retrospect the whole deal turned out to be an example of applied ‘participatory action research’. On the ground, those with a stake in the outcome the decision making process developed and implemented a design that best suited their needs, instead of being developed by some guy in a corporate office on a computer (though good things can be done that way as well). This seems to be a well rounded method for participatory open design of appropriate, liberatory technology. However, the problems caused by a “design for dumpster” well drilling rig they used resulted in problems with dropping that 6 inch pipe that we spent an entire afternoon putting together. They have since succeeded in dropping a 4 inch the full 80 feet. This is an important step in developing their infrastructure to be able to support more collaborators on the farm.


The next element to work on is to develop a more sustainable energy supply (instead of local waste veg oil) based on the PV cells donated by Ersol. You can read more below, but to update that post we will be soldering, assembling and encapsulating the panels in a few weeks based on our efforts and successes during this past weekend to research and develop a firm and robust action plan to ensure that the DIY approach will be successful and lead to panels that will have a long and fruitful life, considering the current capacity for fabrication work on the farm (no open-source, off grid solar encapsulation machines that I know of yet!). I and my friend Vince and hopefully others will venture out to take on this project while Marcin finishes the much anticipated LifeTrac (I helped him unpack an 800lb shipment of materials and parts into his new converted silo workshop). Once that and the panels are finished, they can use the tractor to run the CEB press mobile and use the energy to fabricate necessary parts and amenities for the new buildings and, in turn, support more folks. It is exciting to know that the co-laboratory is growing and that it is plausible that there will be as many as a dozen people living in a well established facility by this time next year, built brick by brick with CEBs and ingenuity. There is talk of a root cellar, full kitchen, fancy restroom facilities and a knowledge/resource library with a few computers, and smoke house for preserving widely available deer meat, among living accommodations and garden terraces.
Additionally, they have been in contact with some important folks in the free school movement, and the implications for the experimental blend of learning, living, research, design and application off the grid for the benefit of all is overwhelming to say the least. It amalgamates the ideas of Brazilian pedagogacist and political dissident Paulo Freire and the legendary social theorist and independent marxist Antonio Gramsci’s concept of the organic intellectual, combined with the general drive for liberated knowledge and participatory, grounded and practical learning (this is just my impression). This seems to be a just and sensible approach to educating ourselves and our progeny in the attempt to reach the goals of sustainability and resilience. In addition, to combine this movement with the appropriate technology movement seems to present a formidable partnership in the global struggle for self sufficiency and Swadeshi. The implications and readily possible results are enormous. Both movements have achieved so much already, and things are unmistakably in motion. As different active and concurrent fronts join forces and new approaches and concepts continue to emerge, develop and be applied, the possibilities for what we can create and live day to day will be endless. So for all of you who are out there sitting-on-ass, like I was only so long ago, its time to put our shoulders to the wheel and connect ideas and put them into action and live passionately for the future. Its high time we turn ourselves from passive consumers to active producers, from passive viewers to active participants, from those who abandonedly ride the increasingly volatile wave of change to those who harness it for the betterment of all. From farmers in India to factory workers in Malaysia to miners in Guyana to researchers, bloggers and activists in the privileged realm (not to leave out integral and citizen actors in the underprivileged realm), citizens of the world are crying out for change on all levels, and putting their inspirations, knowledge and ideas into action. It sure is a great time to be an ‘enlightened’ optimist, as those who are pessimistic about the future of humanity increasingly find themselves counterpointed by these concepts being put into action. So, let us achieve a world where the only times you hear the word ‘power’ are when talking about electrical things off-grid and empowerment (instead, participation, decision making, collaboration, etc.) , where the oppressed and the subaltern become mere historical anecdotes, examples of the injustice wrought by the disempowerment and malice of the past.
I can only look forward with ready hands and a reeling mind to further collaboration with Factor E and others in the broader global movement for Swadeshi. So much being done, so much to do, and the movement grows and grows. Abundance and Justice awaits.

Categories: Challenges, Collaborators, Global Swadeshi, Guests, Infrastructure, Open Source Technology, Permaculture, Visiting, Volunteers, Water Well Drilling

[4] Comments

I detect a widespread lack of acknowledgement of the critical issue of scale in human orgnanization.

E.F. Schumacher’s seminal work on the subject points clearly that human organization simply breaks down after a certain size is reached, as is stated by L. Kohr in The Breakdown of Nations.

Therefore, it is useful to:

1. increase the size at which organization breaks down, by utilizing more advanced practices of human organization. This is difficult, and we haven’t succeeded to this point. There is arguably not one day in the 20th century when armed conflict was not being waged.

2. Operate at the smallest possible scale to assure highest organization: transparency, accountability, distributive economics, all the good P2P stuff. This seems to be the easy option.

Thus, we must start with a quest for decreasing the scale of human enterprise.

I think this can be done for ALL human enterprise – the question being, how much can we reduce the scale in practice – while increasing the quality of life for everyone.

A great case to explore, as the absolute limit of human technology today – is semiconductors or computer chips.

What is the smallest scale we could do this effectively?

My claim is that it can be done on the scale as small as a 40 acre farm, not necessarily millions of square miles that it takes today. If abundant energy is made available as one of the next frontiers of p2p , then silicon semiconductor may be produced anywhere that sand is available. Sand is purified, reduced to silicon, and silicon is refined – by utilizing loads of energy. This could be a case for abundant semiconductor PV cells, or computer chips.

That is not such a far cry as it may first appear. At least absolute abundance of semiconductor PV could be around the corner, if not the computer chips themselves.

What I am implying here is the case for replacing all societal monoliths with small huggable variants. Or at least ones you would want to pass down to your children.

I did do an undergrad thesis on PV production – otherwise I speak from learned ignorance. But I would like to ask anyone if you have any testable evidence that shows that centralization is desirable, or that it should not be thoroughly substituted by appropriate scale as in the p2p movement? There is evidence that large scale leads to corruption, increasing gap between rich and poor, armed conflict, etc. If you have any contrary evidence, please let me know. It seems that it’s a fact that anything large is scale should be broken down, decentralized. I think that’s an unquestionable ‘truth’ not only in the p2p movement, but outside. Centralization is good only to those who benefit. It is clear that it’s a small fraction of the global population.

I say this because I think that it’s possible to attain a new understanding on the issue of scale in human organization. I think it’s possible, and desirable, to create the cultural understanding of the shortcomings of centralization – as opposed to its praise – which is today’s consensus. I simply think this is one instance of half-baked thinking at the level of the entire society – one that stands in the way of much p2p progress.

I’d appreciate any comment on this. I’d just like to know how to communicate the issue of scale properly. I’m open to changing my understanding  if I see some new light here.

These are theoretical points, but they truly determine the progress of Prosperity on a Smaller Scale. The latter is a paradigm whose time has come.

Categories: Challenges

[2] Comments

Look at that frost pattern on our door. The frost came from a combination of moisture and contrasting temperatures… but where did the diamond pattern come from? No shadows cross the door to create such marks. The only guess I have is that somehow the inside of the door is causing this pattern to emerge, but what kind of manufacture would fill a door with a complex criss-cross pattern?

Categories: Challenges

[4] Comments

I always imagined that when I am going to be in my mid sixties, i’ll retire to the woods and live in a small wood shack out in nature. Well, why wait?

Here is my lovely little shack:

You can view more pictures and more information by clicking below. (more…)

Categories: Accomplishments, Challenges, Construction, Infrastructure, Volunteers

No Comments

The cord wood room was coming to completion and we were still without a stove to heat it with. Craigslist, ebay, and local newspapers only had dead ends; the stoves listed were either too expensive, too far away, too big or already sold. I had asked a few people locally if they knew anyone with a stove for sale, but in vain. We were ready to buy a stove that we didn’t really want, but first decided to spend half an hour more calling neighbors and friends before giving in to the inevitable.

To my surprise, within fifteen minutes, a supportive neighbor had called back. A neighbor of his had an old wood burning stove in her attic.

The stove was tucked in the back corner of the attic, behind styrofoam peanuts, a 1950′s baby carriage, army cots, and a cream separator. The family had made their living milking dairy cows, until the 1990s, when prices of milk dropped too low to make it worthwhile. She offered us the cream separator and I hope that we will have a reason to buy it in the not so distant future.

We uncovered a beautiful little stove. Perfect for our needs. You never know what a neighbor might have in their attic, garage, or ditch. It’s a lesson in country living. Networking with your neighbors is often the best way to find treasures.

Once you have a stove (and we now have three!), you need firewood. And our supplies are running out fast. This time, Mother Nature, not the neighbors came to call.

An ice storm struck last night and I woke up to a crystallized world. I also woke up to infrequent, but tremendous crashes. The trees, heavy with ice, were loosing large branches, and in some cases, entire trees fell. At first, I was struck with horror and sadness, especially as I drove through town and saw house after house littered with branches. Then, my thoughts took to another direction: What is going to happen to all that wonderful wood? That’s when I realized that our firewood question had been answered.

It won’t help us until all this ice melts, but at least every cloud has a silver lining.

Categories: Challenges, Infrastructure, Open Source Economic Development

[2] Comments

We have been out of touch for over a week now; an ice storm struck and while we still had power (unlike our neighbors, who do not have off-grid power systems) our internet receiver was covered in ice.  As it is located on top of a tree, also ladden with ice, we could not easily fix the situation.  High temperatures today thawed the receiver and hopefully, that was the only problem.  This is just a short update, to be followed by real content.

Categories: Challenges, Computer

[2] Comments

How much is a twenty-foot diameter building worth…made of earthbags? Does it increase the property value or decrease it?

When we first built our earthbag structure (locally known as the “mud hut”), the very small neighbouring town was buzzing with these questions. The local tax assessor had visited us and apparently, struck dumb with the lack of regularity, had posed the question to the local gossip line.

When every house is “made of ticky-tacky and they all look just the same” (line from a 1950′s song about mass housing construction), the assessors job is easy: Multiply the square footage by some magic number, calculate in some unique features and move on to the next house. But when every feature of a building is unique, then what?

The assessor stopped in again today and wanted to know the dimensions of the greenhouse and will want to come back to measure the earthbag building too. Measure what, I want to know. The number of bags? The length of barbed wire between each course? The number of hours that we continue to put into it? Measure how cozy it is on a cold day and how refreshing it is a warm one? Or the number of spiders, mice, and flies that have slipped in through the unfinished walls and floor? Will she measure its ability to withstand a storm or its invisibility from the road? Or will she measure the CO2 absorbed by the plants on the roof? And what about the knowledge and satisfaction gained from creating ones own space? Will she measure that? Perhaps, I should prepare for an in-depth interview.

*******************************************************************************************

With the walls completed on the cordwood addition, we have begun working on the roof. We are using nearly the same method as we used on the earthbag roof:

Each beam creates the next piece in an upward spiral. Although it’s intensive work, the outcome is very satisfying, both structurally and aesthetically.

Categories: Challenges, Construction, Natural Building

No Comments

For all of you who are interested in building global villages in the future – here are some lessons from our experience. This applies to the case where you start with raw, undeveloped land.

To begin with, the upshot is that we have just succeeded in producing our first compressed earth brick – on November 26. You can follow most of the deployment progress here, and the theoretical work is here.

On the negative side, here is a list of present challenges, all of which must be negotiated as part of the reality of our undertaking. Hardware troubles (equipment breakdown) and software issues (lack of skill -because no amount of schooling can prepare you for pioneering on real land) are the two main challenges. These considerations are taken with the intent of creating a world-class facility by year-end 2010, and the present population of 3. This means every day is precious, and all of us need to be at peak performance.

First trouble is internet, the backbone of our operations. Our 1000 foot power line to the wireless receiver got chewed up by mice – because we have not gotten a chance to bury it for the last 6 months. Too late now. To kill this issue, we decided to migrate from the problematic wireless internet to a land line. Now we decided to get a land line because we cannot afford to lose the week that it would take to get another power line ($200) and bury it properly (additional costs).

Next is the tractor. We just spend $2k on the transmission and clutch. Now the power steering went out. Without it, it is difficult to steer, especially with a loaded front-end loader – so that now we can’t do further work on burying the base of the greenhouse, nor can we pick up additional one-ton bales for mulching. The issue is that our tractor, a Massey Ferguson Model 90, is not a popular one so getting parts and fixing it is more expensive. Our solution immediately is to fix the power steering, then migrate to another tractor, such as an Allis Chalmers D-17 Series 4 via donation, which was very common and parts are available. Of course the long term solution is the open source hybrid-electric tractor, which has no transmission or clutch, and power steering will be a non-issue to fix if it is open source.

Water is the third item. We collect rainwater from our greenhouse roof, at an approximate rate of 400 gallons per inch of rainfall. It has not rained for the last 6 weeks – quite unseasonable. We’re out of water. We hauled in 100 gallons the other day. Today it’s raining (that’s why I’m blogging now) – but the downspout froze overnight, so we are collecting no water, as it is all spilling out of the downspout. (By the end of the day, it unfroze, and we have collected at least 100 gallons) This could have been avoided with foresight. The solution– hopefully in a week – is to dig and finish our well. That’s another story: one part of the purchased hydraulic-rotary drilling rig from Rockmaster was bent, and a water pump connection had a leak in it. Replacement parts have been shipped. I did not micromanage this project – so we still have no working rig and we’ve already had the rig for a few months. There is no robust solution to accountability of our team outside of full internal accountability of all members. I learn that the accountability issue is an important one – because it will always exist in the presence of deadlines and set deliverables.

Power is next. The Lister, since we cleaned it out to regain compression – is still not put back together completely – as the CEB was a priority for the last month. Today I will finally put it back together. We were running a backup generator in the meanwhile. Regarding our donated battery pack – one of the 24 cells is dead – so we can use only half of the battery pack until we get a replacement cell. Our solution here is to look for another donated battery pack, as we’re seeing that its capaticty is closer to 5 kWhr as opposed to the 10 that we sought. The longer term electrical solution is the Solar Turbine with on-demand Babington burner backup and hot oil storage, both for cooking and power generation when the sun doesn’t shine. In the near term, we’ll look for solar cell donations. We are interested in a total solar cell capacity of 5 kW for 24 people.

Ronny’s house addition is still in progress, and he’s freezing cold in the unheated camper. Our goal is to finish his house by December 7, so bye-bye CEB until then. That’s a reality. Of course the CEB would have been the solution here.

The greenhouse itself is rather cold at night, even if it’s in the 80s on a sunny day. The stove is not sufficient to heat it at the farthest end, so some plants have died. In the immediate term, we will close off one half of the greenhouse. The long-term greenhouse solution is unprecedented double-layer CEB walls with dynamic liquid insulation (SolaRoof.org) in between, with double-leyer glazing and standard SolaRoof technique on top. By the way, this is particularly attractive and affordable if we have our open source plastic extruder for producing high-tech glazing.

Regarding bees, I still have to give them supplemental feeding. It looks like the 2 colonies are not overly robust, and their stored reserves of honey are small. Moreover, we did not collect any honey this year. We are doing them organically, without any form of pesticide. We will try Sasha’s organic bee cultivation – where he uses a smaller-than-normal foundation that assists in warding off mites – as soon as we have the energy for it. Sasha, just point us to the source of the foundation in the USA, and we’ll try it.

This leads into the involvement of others, if we are committed to $3M capitalization by year end 2010. That means $3k per day – quite a task if we are living on $3/day. Indeed, that would make an interesting David vs. Goliath episode. But the pen is mightier than the sword. See this pen rolling gently on the page? It is quicker than a thousand daggers, more potent than the nuclear bomb.

Our program is to detail our status and working issues –from the most mundane to the most exotic – and deploy a team of tens to hundreds. The tasks are then to write grants, fundraise, and develop resources based on a clear set of deliverables. Motivation for this can be provided only by injecting tasty meaning into the endeavor. We are confident that this can be done by focusing and prioritizing a set of technologies that constitute an open source technology pattern language for localization (taken from our other blog) on the one hand, and a concrete foundation for a Global Village construction set on the other.

The bottom line is, we are not trying to provide a fixed solution set to Global Village localization infrastructures. Most people who interact with us fail to recognize that we are just proposing a seed set of widely-applicable items – which we support with a rating system and our full intention to deploy. This is our means only to movitate concrete action – and transgress endless armchair theory.

In support of this approach, Franz Nahrada has pointed out an existing, open source funding mechanism that we should replicate. Their development item is an open source wireless bridge. It has been funded by donations, large and small, from people interested in the product. This is the core of the funding mechanism that we are proposing for our 16 Global Village technologies: fundraising from stakeholders based on a well-defined deliverable. A diagram of this process for OSE was published here. We will apply this technique to the 16 technologies on a case-by-case basis. We are looking for individuals to take on the role of project managers for each of the technologies. This means setting up the donation-handling and deployment infrastructure for each project. Please send us an email at joseph.dolittle@gmail.com if you would like to take on that role.

What’s in It for You? Why should a wide support group participate in developing Open Source Techology for localization? The main reasons are embodied in four products of the collaborative development process:

Level 1 – Significant products at absolute lowest cost.

  • CEB, solar turbine, flex fab workshops, turnkey greenhouses, cars, tractors, other machinery, with infrastructure and localization focus
  • Endpoint of open source development process is a physical production facility

Level 2 – Production workshops – you build the above over a weekend

  • Requires significant workshop infrastructure
  • Unprecedented production model with respect to advanced technologies

Level 3 – Enterprise incubation via open franchising- open product design and enterprise plans

  • Household energy, integrated building, CEB machines, greenhouses, edible landscaping, automobile leasing, heavy equipment leasing, consulting, etc.

Level 4 – Replicable Global Villages – creation and evolution of communities

  • Open Source Enterprise Communities via voluntary contract
  • Research, development, and education lifestyle
  • Right livelihood and land base
  • Investment mechanisms for replication

Otherwise, stay tuned for our forthcoming proposal, supporting videos, and slide presentation. Contact us if you would like to be placed on a direct email list to receive the proposal and supporting materials.

Categories: Challenges, Infrastructure, Open Source Economic Development

[3] Comments

« Previous PageNext Page »